The timing of the Diddy verdict isn't too surprising either. IMHO, he got sloppy though - the video of him bearing the shit out of his girlfriend was appalling. I know it's a game, but when you have DAs going after DJT for he said/she said shit in a department store 20 years ago, but not that, you know things are fucked up. (Oh, and where was the Pussy Hat brigade then? Gah, I can't stand the hypocrisy)
Hugh Hefner wasn't that sloppy, but maybe his overt 'cover' that he basically peddled sex made it easier - the problem from what I can tell is that Playboy became to be considered tame, so you have the Epsteins and the Diddys who are "upping the game". (I saw a clip that Nicole Kidman is allegedly making a film where beastialty is a theme. I am sure it will be presented very artfully and tastefully. 🙄)
You mentioned the AI push of late which I also have noticed; I was listening to Walter Kirn and Matt Taibbi yesterday and they where talking about this. WK pointed out that the porn industry is the first to utilize all of the media technology.
I've seen multiple posts from Elon talking about Epstein over the last couple days so my first thought was that this was going to be a way to draw people to the new party, but I'm very out of the loop at the moment.
I think Epstein was primarily an escrow agent for deals between different cabal groups. Think about it: if you control a string of people through blackmail, and you want to make a peace treaty with someone who has the same type of power, how can both parties ever trust the other and make a deal? By exchanging assets, and the only assets that matter are blackmailed people. I read about Epstein blackmail during Clinton's administration, he was so open about it.
And I doubt all the evidence is compromised. Anything they wanted to save could be under wraps from Maxwell's trial (or even Epstein's own trial), with records that it was valid evidence at that time. Trump appearing to quash the conversation can easily be a lure, just like his tax returns. We'll see. This subject being in the news cycle was orchestrated, but to what end we'll only know at a future date.
"Epstein was primarily an escrow agent for deals between different cabal groups"
Correct. I call them "bag men." Sometimes all he had to do was arrange meetings, nothing more. What mattered was he catalogued who/what/when/where. Consider him an archivist for the Cabal. Kind of like a "neutral" block-chain for global blackmail. Names are obscured, but transactions are recorded.
"And I doubt all the evidence is compromised"
Enough is. At least, what the DOJ has.
Say you had a sack of potatoes. One is rotten. That's fine, you can still make mashed potatoes.
What if two are? Eh, you still have enough.
What about four? Ten? All but one?
You're left with a solitary baked potato. Still good, still usable, but at a certain point you start to wonder, "why is this one the only good one?" Can you trust it? How long do you have until it, too, goes bad? If all the others are done for, then it has to have a very urgent expiration date.
Extrapolated for blackmail, then that last solitary "good potato" is hella suspicious. Almost like it was left uncorrupted so you would eat it in your eagerness to have "at least one win." Cut it open, and guess what?
One "bad apple" can indeed spoil the bunch. Especially when you're arguing with lawyers willing to do/say anything to get their client off the hook. "Innocent until proven guilty" is essential for the sake of liberty, but is regularly exploited.
Though, keep in mind, this only applies to what is usable in a court of law. Spies and soldiers don't give a piss, since "orders are orders." Checks and balances sometimes means the Executive branch can just take out the trash before it has a chance to hurt us, or even be known in most cases. Legislature can't declare war on shadows and Courts can't convict entire organizations. Hopefully that might change soon. I am so eager for entire boards of corporations going to jail instead of a silly fine that barely takes a cut out of profits.
The timing of the Diddy verdict isn't too surprising either. IMHO, he got sloppy though - the video of him bearing the shit out of his girlfriend was appalling. I know it's a game, but when you have DAs going after DJT for he said/she said shit in a department store 20 years ago, but not that, you know things are fucked up. (Oh, and where was the Pussy Hat brigade then? Gah, I can't stand the hypocrisy)
Hugh Hefner wasn't that sloppy, but maybe his overt 'cover' that he basically peddled sex made it easier - the problem from what I can tell is that Playboy became to be considered tame, so you have the Epsteins and the Diddys who are "upping the game". (I saw a clip that Nicole Kidman is allegedly making a film where beastialty is a theme. I am sure it will be presented very artfully and tastefully. 🙄)
You mentioned the AI push of late which I also have noticed; I was listening to Walter Kirn and Matt Taibbi yesterday and they where talking about this. WK pointed out that the porn industry is the first to utilize all of the media technology.
I've seen multiple posts from Elon talking about Epstein over the last couple days so my first thought was that this was going to be a way to draw people to the new party, but I'm very out of the loop at the moment.
I think you nailed it.
I think Epstein was primarily an escrow agent for deals between different cabal groups. Think about it: if you control a string of people through blackmail, and you want to make a peace treaty with someone who has the same type of power, how can both parties ever trust the other and make a deal? By exchanging assets, and the only assets that matter are blackmailed people. I read about Epstein blackmail during Clinton's administration, he was so open about it.
And I doubt all the evidence is compromised. Anything they wanted to save could be under wraps from Maxwell's trial (or even Epstein's own trial), with records that it was valid evidence at that time. Trump appearing to quash the conversation can easily be a lure, just like his tax returns. We'll see. This subject being in the news cycle was orchestrated, but to what end we'll only know at a future date.
"Epstein was primarily an escrow agent for deals between different cabal groups"
Correct. I call them "bag men." Sometimes all he had to do was arrange meetings, nothing more. What mattered was he catalogued who/what/when/where. Consider him an archivist for the Cabal. Kind of like a "neutral" block-chain for global blackmail. Names are obscured, but transactions are recorded.
"And I doubt all the evidence is compromised"
Enough is. At least, what the DOJ has.
Say you had a sack of potatoes. One is rotten. That's fine, you can still make mashed potatoes.
What if two are? Eh, you still have enough.
What about four? Ten? All but one?
You're left with a solitary baked potato. Still good, still usable, but at a certain point you start to wonder, "why is this one the only good one?" Can you trust it? How long do you have until it, too, goes bad? If all the others are done for, then it has to have a very urgent expiration date.
Extrapolated for blackmail, then that last solitary "good potato" is hella suspicious. Almost like it was left uncorrupted so you would eat it in your eagerness to have "at least one win." Cut it open, and guess what?
https://www.eatortoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/potato-dark-skinny-caverns-scaled-e1682606855307-1024x930.jpeg
One "bad apple" can indeed spoil the bunch. Especially when you're arguing with lawyers willing to do/say anything to get their client off the hook. "Innocent until proven guilty" is essential for the sake of liberty, but is regularly exploited.
Though, keep in mind, this only applies to what is usable in a court of law. Spies and soldiers don't give a piss, since "orders are orders." Checks and balances sometimes means the Executive branch can just take out the trash before it has a chance to hurt us, or even be known in most cases. Legislature can't declare war on shadows and Courts can't convict entire organizations. Hopefully that might change soon. I am so eager for entire boards of corporations going to jail instead of a silly fine that barely takes a cut out of profits.