I’m not saying this is happening, but let’s craft a little plot based on wild assumptions to see if it holds any water…
…
Let’s say there’s a social media app for short-form commentary and triple-digit character posts. It’s owned by “the correct people.” Despite this, it’s the most popular social media app for “free” speech, hands down.
An election happens and everyone realizes the app is censoring. You’ll be blacklisted, shadowbanned, and/or banned for expressing general distrust in the election and the counting of the ballots. After the election outcome is “settled”, most of these people in the “allegedly” infringed political demographic leave the app. They’re gone now, which could be seen as a blessing, but it also now becomes nigh impossible to tune any computer simulation algorithms, or theory-craft, or control what they’re talking about. You can’t censor people who aren’t on your platform. More importantly, though, you don’t know the opinion of the common man anymore. Furthermore, rampant bot use to “control the consensus” on the platform have made it impossible to determine what the population consensus actually is anymore.
In other words, your app smells its own farts so much and has bled off any good will harbored in the hearts of “the wrong-think crowd” that is is no longer serviceable as a “network” whereby you can catch some fish and ask them what they think about any given political subject. Polls are all skewed and unrealistically inflated to support the “current thing” your benefactors are pushing.
You have no idea what the opposition is thinking anymore…
The previous election went “your way”, sure, but the silent majority is an unknown quantity now. You can’t fact-check people who aren’t in your purview to fact-check. That’s dangerous.
What’s more is that another election is coming up and you no longer have a tool by which to determine what issues people actually care about in order to tune your spin-cycle media and campaign narrative pushes. The elections are definitely, certainly not rigged but you still need to make it look like everything was legitimate because loose lips sink ships even when the ships are doing nothing wrong, I swear. At the very least, it’s important to reinforce the Plausible Deniability Doctrine amongst the normies so they have some authority to point to and chant “officials wouldn’t say that if it wasn’t true!”
What do you do?
Well, the first objective is to get rid of the bots inflating the platform and making it hard to use it as a litmus test.
A second objective is to get the “wrongthinkers” to come back and use the service to plan and coordinate, thereby allowing you to “listen in” to what they’re going on about and then, yourself, counter-strategize accordingly.
The third objective is to crush any alternatives to the system that may have risen to power ever since the exodus of “wrongthinkers” of whom were ostracized and pushed off, thereby moving to build their own social media outlets to compete against the perceived “Big Brother” one.
How might you accomplish these goals?
Well, get a guy who is “on the side of the wrongthinkers” and blast him in media. Set him up to be a villain in the eyes of the corporate media and the “wrongthinkers” will flock to him for daring to challenging the status quo.
He has to be their advocate — expressing genuine concern about the platform.
He has to be rich — enough to buy the platform outright.
He also has to be loyal to the Cabal, but not obviously so. People have to perpetually question his motives, particularly so he doesn’t fall out of the “limelight.”
His business has to have been involved in the biggest of scams that the elite have running, so that his money is actually just laundered money sourced from tax money to pay for something like climate change or whatever. If his income isn’t controlled, then he isn’t controlled.
Finally, have him declare his intentions to buy the platform and make a big hub-bub about it not being good for “our democracy.” Fight him in court but ultimately relent and let him take over. The more support he gets from the “wrongthinkers” the better he’ll look in their eyes and more solid their devotion towards him. He has to become their primary advocate for freedom of speech.
Everything has to hinge on him…
Time passes, and after enough discourse online make sure it appears as though he’s actually gonna “right the ship” as it pertains to the platform and it’s egregious censorship tactics that were essential in order to perpetuate the previous pandemic as well as control the release of information as it pertains to the totally normal and completely safe and effective election that no one is allowed to question.
The “wrongthinkers” come back, convinced that there’s been a beneficial change in their favor, and alternative apps that may or may not be run by the person who certainly didn’t win the last election are effectively throttled, with people genuinely thinking the platform has “turned over a new leaf” in favor of the party most opposed to and oppressed by the Main Stream Media.
Eventually, however, with that next election cycle looming, something has to be done to clamp down on the “wrongthinkers” now that they have successfully been corralled back to the platform they used to hate.
The trap is set, so it’s now time to trip it.
Hire a harlot of the WEF variety and have the rich advocate for the “wrongthinkers” step aside. Re-introduce the censorship slowly, like boiling a frog, and have the harlot take the blame, preserving the rich advocate’s credibility from the direct onslaught for as long a period as possible. With the “wrongthinkers” thrown off the scent and scrambling to establish themselves on the alternatives at the height of the election season instead of when they could in the years prior, the “rebranded” platform can once again run the same racket it ran four years ago, having successfully re-established itself as a “fair and balanced” outlet concerning public opinion and consensus.
We’ll call it “Operation: Fool them Twice” or “Operation: Poison Pill”
“There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.” ―George W. Bush
Basically, all I’m saying is that if I were going to do all this to help rig the next election; if I were to try to trick people to come back to the platform that openly censored them at the most pivotal time in the Nation’s politics… I probably wouldn’t do much differently than is being done.
The plan is solid… well, solid enough. There’s not many other alternatives to being able to consensus crack and/or trick the Silenced Majority into coming back to a platform that viciously censors and mocks them. A bridge was burned in the last election, so building a new one requires a lot of trickery.
Ultimately, the ball is in Elon’s Court. Is he a good guy? Bad guy? White Hat? Black Hat? Double-agent? Triple-agent? Wild card? Something in between? I’ll let you decide. I’m not convinced of my own argument here, but the chessboard certainly is stacked for this play to be made, so I’m cluing you in just in case some fuckery is afoot.
"Need for symbolism (comms) will be their downfall".
Maybe [they] don't know this even themselves anymore, as it seems like many have flipped.
Twitters original logo symbolised (I think) cabal approved pedophilia. The earliest reference I found was this play - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blue_Bird_(play) from 1908 It got the Hollywood treatment in 1940 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blue_Bird_(1940_film) starring Shirley Temple I suppose my point being that Twitter is absolutely rotten at its core