Project Looking Glass, in brief.

And its various interpretations.

Listen, first off, I’m just a hillbilly from the Bible Belt. I’m not a special agent, or a government researcher. My knowledge primarily comes from personal experience, reading really old manuscripts found on the internet, and a whole bunch of sitting around thinkin’ ‘bout stuff. Consider this a preliminary disclaimer. I have no “inside knowledge” of how it actually is done.

So, I’m not exactly a reliable source when it comes to the whole Looking Glass, bilocation and prediction thing in application. The theories, however, are another story.

What I can tell you is how one might logically arrive at such conclusions based on a bit of introspection among other esoteric phenomena. It’s one part psychology, one part deduction, and another part chance.

Anyways, let’s begin with listing possible interpretations of Project Looking Glass and figuring out which one is being referred to in the modern conspiracy interpretations.

Types of Looking Glasses

Okay, in terms of folklore there are three types of “looking glasses.” The earliest ever written about are just simple mirrors. You look into the mirror and see a reflection. If it’s straight on, you see yourself. If you tilt it, you can see around things, like being able to see around corners.

The second interpretation concerns magnification. Your simple text magnifying glass is the basic model all the way up to telescopes, binoculars, spyglasses, jeweler’s glasses, eyeglasses and scopes. As opposed to mirrors, you bend light using lenses to “zoom” in or out as it pertains to perception.

The third interpretation is far less common than the previous two, and in some ways employs the logic of both. It entails the reflection and refraction of light on the surface of a clear lake. This is known as the Fresnel effect.

Basically, depending on the angle of viewing, you either see through the water or you see the scenic reflection. The further away from the water the more it reflects the scene beyond, and this is due to the properties of both water and light.

What you might notice is that all three interpretations include some degree of altered perception in order to view things you otherwise would not be able to. Mirrors either show you your self or allow you to peer around corners, thereby displacing your point of view. Magnification allows one to view far off things or very small things depending on how you tune the device. The lake combines the two and demonstrates that there are two worlds taking place simultaneously, one under and one above the water. In truth, the reflection we see of grand objects in the distance are but an illusion, and only wavy and wobbly interpretations of reality spread out upon the surface of the lake or pond. Displace the surface by causing some waves and the illusion is broken. You still can’t see through the illusion to the bed of the pond or lake, but you begin to realize that things aren’t actually how they first appear.

Some scholars even call this a “portal” which separates the world of water, the world of information and knowledge, from the physical world of reality seen in the distance and our personal imitation, the reflection, which is imperfect and cannot fully encapsulate what is true and knowable because we are but one set of eyes looking at the pond. Everyone has their own vantage point, and so have different things they can and cannot see. You cannot simply see through another’s eyes, so what you see is only an instance, a copy, of the unified vision you all share together.

It may seem pointless, but all this is necessary to understand as we approach Project Looking Glass in proper, because the project itself is nothing more than an attempt to displace the surface of the lake in order to affect reality. If I throw a rock in the lake at the reflection of the mountain is it possible the mountain in the distance will crumble and fall apart? If I alter the illusion, is it possible to affect reality?

That’s the big question philosophers have pondered for centuries now…

And it is in my opinion that there is some avenue by which they can alter reality by altering the illusion, if only for a time. Eventually the waves of the lake diffuse, the surface calms, and things go back to how they should be. That’s the idea anyways.

The Odd Newspaper

Consider this: I hand you a newspaper for today. You start reading it and notice a few things seem pretty off. For one, the Atlantic ocean is on fire. Yup, it says that the entire surface of the Atlantic ocean is engulfed in flames and things look pretty dire for the coastal cities.

Now, you can either believe the first thing you read, which a lot of people end up doing because “If they printed it then it must be true!” A wise individual, however, will look for alternative sources. More importantly, you’d check to see if the newspaper is legitimate at all. That aside, let’s talk more about what I did.

You see, this is the strange bit about perception. What I’d actually done was take a newspaper from a reputable outlet and inserted my own news story such that it is indistinguishable from any other page. Other copies of the newspaper for the same day did not have my edits, just the one I handed to you. Even though it was not true, and easily verified as a farce, for a moment you took time out of your day to have to validate whether or not the Atlantic ocean was, in fact, on fire. Like throwing a big rock into the lake, I caused some waves that forced you to stir a bit and figure out what is and isn’t reality.

I caused a disruption in your perception of reality.

What’s notable here is that in no way, shape, or form did my edit affect all other newspapers. More importantly, my edit did not alter the ORIGINAL that all those instances of newspapers are merely copies of.

To clarify, I didn’t alter the source material only one instance out of countless many.

Imagine, though, if I DID at some point alter the original and people around town all simultaneously believed that the Atlantic ocean was on fire. It’d take a lot longer to validate whether or not it was true or false, correct?

Furthermore, imagine if I did it to ALL newspapers in town.

Now we got a big conundrum.

At that special point in time the whole town is convinced, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the Atlantic ocean is on fire and every coastal city from here to Timbuktu has been set ablaze!

For a brief moment, as people clamor to get an accurate report from people on the coast, the truth has been lost, scrambled among the masses as they scurry to and froe trying to figure out what is actually going on.

Kind of like the War of the World broadcast from Orson Welles, right?

For a moment, I caused an actual impact doing nothing but altering the illusion everyone shared. The world moving as if the Atlantic ocean IS on fire, despite it not being so.

That is power.

That is magic. A spell cast on the minds of many to manipulate them into acting a certain way. Getting more out of them and their reaction than the effort I put in distorting their view.

I will have moved mountains using nothing more than people’s perception… If only for a moment. Eventually the lies will disperse, the lake calms, and people will see what I did. They will again spot both the rocks on the bed, the illusion on the surface, and the always undisturbed reality on the horizon…

But, sometimes just a moment is all you need to cause a revolution. In the fear and panic of the moment people will act a certain way, and if I can anticipate how they will move and react accordingly I can be there to take advantage of the calamity and capitalize on the farce. If I work quick and clever enough I can avoid the truth coming out amidst the ruin of the “normal” way of life. I could swap out reality with a “new normal” before the ripples eventually settle.

If I keep up the lies, I could even keep everyone confused and uncertain indefinitely…

I’m sure by now you see how this is currently the modus operandi of the propaganda darlings in our Main Stream Media, correct?

It’s no mistake there are allusions to water with the STREAM portion of their “official” designation…

Through the Looking Glass

So, what does all this have to do with Project Looking Glass?

Well, looking glasses are about distorting perception. Looking into the future and altering the now to avoid or arrive at a future that benefits you. To be able to bilocate, on some accounts, and peer in to the doings of others behind closed doors.

All these things hold true with my above analogy. Control is the goal.

To be able to manipulate your prey and get them to act as you wish. To be able to see into the future, see into hidden places, and gain insight. To be able to alter your perception to look around corners, or reveal things far away or very small. This is Project Looking Glass in all its interpretations. It’s the idea of being able to change the perceptions of people in the now to affect the future. Sometimes that requires you rewriting the past to suite the now you need to occur to arrive at that future…

It just so happens you need a population in order to get the device to work.

The internet is more of the same. It is a “net” after all. Once again, allusions to water surround this subject.

By monitoring what everyone is thinking you have a vast ocean of information to sort through to gain insight on the thoughts and opinions of the Collective Consciousness. If you know how people will act, how they react, by running controlled experiments on them time and time again, you can eventually devise a plan to manipulate them like sheep getting herded by a sheepdog. A little training of the population also is essential, by using projections, like movies, to tell-a-vision of the future; to coerce them into accepting certain routes of escape or safety using false idols. You’ll have them saying “we should do it like in the movies, because it worked out for them!”

That’s one big reason they clue us in to what they’re up to through media. They want us to internalize the paths, a curated set of paths, for us to follow. Paths they have all sorts of contingencies for. So long as we move how they plan, then they can trap us all in the “net.” They use behavioral conditioning to tease us into doing what they want subconsciously.

That’s Project Looking Glass in a nutshell.

And it is something that was well understood centuries ago, around early 1700’s at the latest. They’ve been working tirelessly to train us into falling into certain motifs, certain channels, which can be dammed or released according to the pressure we might exert, to ensure nothing in their world breaks down.

Figures like Nostradamus employed much of the same techniques to peer into the future. He didn’t just gaze at the “stars”, he cultivated news from around town and gained insight from the actions of celebrities. He compared them to tales and events and their outcomes, like cross-referencing the results from previous experiments. He then plugged those into an algorithm which spat out cryptic interpretations of the inputs he shoved in. Just like tracking the movement of the stars, you can track the movement of celebrities, aristocrats, and the like to figure out which will clash and which will displace one another.

One other such method of derivation is through things like Tarot or other forms of scrying. You aren’t actually peering into the future. You’re peering into a potential future. Each of the cards in a Tarot deck represent possible figures, archetypes, that are definite to exist in any given society. We, as individuals, apply our own interpretations and perceptions to the cards to establish an illusion of reality, like the reflection on the lake.

By seeing those figures reflected in the cards, we can contemplate possible interactions between those characters. We’re offered a random shuffling of them together and using our own insight and understanding we can “see” how they might react with one another. By shuffling the cards around and laying them out we can devise scenarios we otherwise would never think to organize on our own. It escapes our biases and offers samples of the unlikely.

It’s like playing the Walmart game.

For those unfamiliar with the game, you go into Walmart with a friend and 40 bucks or so each. The task is to illicit a reaction out of the cashier based on your purchases. The funnier the reaction, the more “points” you get.

For instance, I go in and buy an axe, a rope, some black garbage bags, and a tarp.

Sounds like I’m about to go murder someone, doesn’t it?

Likewise, my friend gets some condoms, cucumbers, lotion, cigarettes, and a big stuffed teddy bear.

Put the pieces together…

This is no different than looking at Tarot cards. You’re offered nothing more than a potential scenario based on a sum of parts. It just so happens that with Tarot, or other forms of scrying and divination, those parts are reflections of real characters. Real people.

You’re basically playing with dolls, like wrestling or comic book action figures. By knowing the individual personalities the dolls represent, you can engage in a finer understanding and re-creation of how those two would encounter one another. You can logically deduce how the interaction will play out without having to see it play out in reality. You can theory-craft, troubleshoot, and otherwise fiddle around with the details without investing anything other than time and brainpower.

If you catalogue all the interactions, you have yourself a guide, a playbook, on how to respond should any of these events actually come to pass, just like how you can capitalize on the events following your altering of the local newspapers.

In other words…

Project Looking Glass is the very notion and concept of what we call a Simulation.

A simulation that the Cabal nutjobs have longed to put into action as a full replacement for reality; as a means by which to move mountains using nothing more than a rock cast upon the surface of the perceptual lake.

Do notions of The Matrix come to mind?

Through the Looking Glass.