Planets and Ogres are like Onions. They have Layers.
Flat Earth theory, step aside. We're Onion Earth Theorists now!
Flat Earth theories are stupid. Modern ones anyways.
Intentionally so. They’re mocking people with coded language.
Flat Earther = Someone who envisions a World where valleys are filled and mountains leveled. Paths made straight for the coming of the Lord.
That’s Comms.
The Cabal frequently criticize and ostracize people who think “Flat Earth” could become a reality — that Jesus is the Messiah and John the Baptist, the Lion crying in the wilderness, was his harbinger calling for all debts to be paid and sins repented so that none may be caught unawares of the Coming of the King of Kings.
An end to sin, where all men are made equal in love to the Creator.
So…
Why do I bring this up? Because we’re being lied to. They obscure and bend facts in order to talk about people without their knowledge. It’s their greatest tool, and a great tool it is. By withholding the Language of Symbols from humanity by excluding it from our lexicon starting from an early age, they are able to quash critical thinking and metaphorical/abstract thought with the replacement of a hyper-literal interpretation of the world.
In other words, people who can spot patterns in nature and society are an obstacle for tyranny and Evil.
Of these many lies we’ve been told, indoctrinated since our youth, one concerns the shape of the World we live in/upon.
Earth Mysteries. Earth Sciences.
https://archive.sacred-texts.com/earth/index.htm
Everything from the Firmament to vast underground ecosystems a-la Land of the Lost or Journey to the Center of the Earth.
Talks of a Maelstrom somewhere in the farthest reaches of the oceans which sucks ships into a massive whirlpool.
The many tales vary in scope and importance, but ultimately there is a sincere suspicion that there is an “Underworld.” Either a network of caves with some form of light/heat to sustain creepy crawlies, or a legit otherworldly Neverland few eyes have ever seen. A place where tales of subterranean reptilian body snatchers roam or a bonafide Greek Hades, or Yomi if you’re a fan of Japanese world myths.
Perhaps you’re also a fan of the Labyrinthian Tartarus, which is a world between worlds, said to inhabit the space between Hades and the Infinite Abys?
Either way, there’s a bevy of stories from all generations that allude to the idea that the Earth may very well be “hollow.”
Some even consider that there are “layers” of the Earth and each layer consists of an entirely different types of biomes, home to fantastical fauna and flora.
The Onion Model of Earth
For a while now I’ve tried to rectify these tales through science, metaphor, Comms, etc.
However, I can’t get over how common the idea is that a real life Gehenna exists.
A cave where the dead, or near dead, are cast into a deep, black valley and burned from the inside out by insidious toxic gasses produced from the rotting of countless bodies.
That is why I have settled on a middle-ground theory, in order to account for all the various stories as well as explain why it is we view the Earth in the way we do, as a “jawbreaker” which consists of a Crust, Mantle, and Core.
I call my theory the Onion Earth Theory.
An alternative name would be the Toroidal, Alternating Magnetic Layer Earth Model.
Look at this model:
Already you see what I’m talking about?
The “official” model of the Earth already has layers like an onion.
However, it’s far too simplistic for my liking. It feels artificial in a way.
For one, we know the Earth is porous. Every other planet in the Universe, especially the Gas Giants, are theorized to have interiors not unlike a sponge, with many glassy rock and mineral-constructed cavities for super-dense gases to inhabit.
Why is the Earth any different?
Well, it isn’t. We’re porous too. Most of the crust, mantle, and even core consist of a sponge-like construction where bubbles of super-critical molten elements churn about. Parts of the interior layers melt away, and the mineral deposits consisting of a lower melting point are eaten away at different rates. Volcanoes are the result.
Yet, even with this explanation, with the Earth being porous and sponge-like, I feel as though we’re still not being told something.
Think of it like this.
Cut open an onion.
See, it’s very similar to how we view the Earth. Many layers surrounding a core. All very circular.
Every experiment on the books confirms that this is how the Earth looks like inside. They all run studies and calculations to come to a definitive conclusion that this is how the center of the Earth looks.
Well, they would, if the experiments were all done at the Equator. It’d be a convenient way to obscure the true nature of the Earth. Malicious actors could hyper-fixate on one set of results while work to hide the other set done with a different cross-section.
You see, the onion above is cut straight through the side.
Like in Figure A:
Figure B, however, would produce a different cross-section.
It would instead look like this:
Two pictures, two cuts, same onion.
Different cross-section.
Look at the “sprout” or “stem” end of the onion called the “Tunic.”
You see how there is a clear separation between the layers? A gap forming where one might peer in between the layers?
Would this explain the more fanciful interpretations of a “Hollow Earth” and illustrations such as this one from The Symmes Theory of Concentric Spheres, compiled by Americus Symmes, 1878?
Experiments run at the Arctic and Antarctic zones were out of the question for 1878’s philosophers and explorers. Is speculation enough to go on?
Now take a look at A Journey to the Earth's Interior; Marshall B. Gardner, 1920:
Again, what we see is a cross-section of the Earth from the equatorial, Figure A cut line.
Yet they still had an idea that the World was hollow and the layers had gaps between them that could be traversed should you have the proper equipment to do so. Keep in mind, gravity would be well out of control for a wooden frigate should it have decided to head down the Maelstrom into the brink.
Back to the theory…
What if, instead of a “jawbreaker” with evenly laid layers throughout, Earth’s interior was more like an onion?
Where one side is the “stem” and the other the “roots.”
Which in turn manifest as our Arctic and Antarctic Poles.
Take a look at Earth compared to an onion:
It always bothered me how the Arctic has no land mass, yet the Antarctic does. The Antarctic(South Pole) has so much more geography as compared to the North, which is almost entirely just floating panels of ice and that big lump we call Greenland.
This idea gives an explanation, at least, that one side is set to “suck in” energy while the other “blows out” energy. That would explain why the Antarctic is so much different than the Arctic as we view it from space despite both being “two mirror ends of a magnet.” They aren’t very “mirror-like” to me, at least. One side is notably larger…
This is how I see it:
The archipelagos underneath the Arctic cap are like the various “spires” and concentric rings with gaps between their peaks that you can make out on an onion. As the layers separate, water fills the voids, and you get your “Hollow Earth” and Maelstrom location situated at the North Pole. Perhaps even alluding to the descriptions of Atlantis by Plato.
Then you also have the outside of the onion, which would help explain why mountains and valleys, especially marine ones, are generally always oriented North-South rather than West-East.
Follow the creases of the onion and compare-contrast where the deepest underwater valleys are, like the Marianas Trench. Consider that deep crease to be like the trench.
Then, where these valleys are deepest and overlap, you get your Tectonic Plates.
Again, most tectonic plates, and the continents that ride on them, are longer North-South than they are wide, going West-East..
Why would the majority of mountain ranges be oriented North-South, as well as the plates underneath them? If you think of it like an onion, it’s a little more palatable.
There definitely seems to be a bias, anyways, where everything is twirling about the axis:
It’s not perfect, but it’s a start.
Which leaves one last angle…
The Magnetosphere
What is the magnetosphere?
Well, if we assume the Onion Model is correct, and one pole is the “root” which takes in energy and the other pole is a “stem” which “distributes” that energy after it is gestated in the Earth, then a toroidal flux diagram like this makes a bit more sense:
One sucks in, the other pushes out. Follow the arrows.
Could this “twirl” explain the “twist” in the otherwise perfectly North-South mountain orientations?
I think the pattern lines up well enough to say it’s a possibility.
I further postulate that each layer inverses the previous layer’s magnetic field orientation. Basically, each layer is “swirling” in alternating directions. All the even layers may swirl clockwise, while all the odd layers swirl counter-clockwise. This gyroscopic stability would help keep Earth spinning on its axis, instead of bobbing around violently. I have little proof for that, and it’s difficult to describe, but it’s worth considering, and it would be convenient should you wish to design a space craft with a magnetic liquid swirling in an alternating fashion, separated by cores of a specialized neutral-polarity material.
But, that’s a topic for another time…
Conclusions
I hope I’ve been clear enough in my theory…
It’s something to ponder on. It’s especially suspicious that they won’t let people go anywhere near the North and South poles. They claim its for “safety” reasons, but we all know that the Cabal heads take little vacations to Antarctica for various reasons, and I think it’s because they’re closer to the “source” of things.
There’s a lot of military bases around the ice caps, after all…
Are they afraid that if we run the same independent Earth Science experiments that we might find out the Earth is layered, and those layers can be facilitated for faster subterrainean travel? Think about DUMBs(Deep Underground Military Bases) and rumors of underground submarine channels and caves that the military uses to get around faster like Godzilla does in the most recent reboots.
Then there’s theories of them messing with the weather. Triggering volcanoes. Releasing pent up earth-quake energies…
Neutrinos and weather manipulation aside, we know there’s something funky going on under the ice, and my go-to suspicions is it has something to do with our long list of records concerning Hollow Earth, Atlantis, and perhaps even the more modern ideas that Aliens have some big-ass space ship under there charging up using the Magnetosphere of the Earth like a big ol’ battery charger. Wild theories with pointless reasons to deceive to be sure, but it’s not like the Cabal have never needed a logical reason to lie to us. Most of the time they just lie to lie, because they feel empowered telling us falsities and watching the idiots eat it up as gospel truth. They’re addicted to control, and control is most easily wielded with deceit and fantasy.
Though, it could just be as simple as them not wanting us to know how the Earth really works. Maybe for no other reason to secure Comms, like with the Flat Earth Comms. Then again Tesla Tech and Free-Energy designs that harvest the latent magnetic fields of the Earth are always on the table!
Ultimately, you can take or leave this idea.
To be clear, I’m not alluding to any ideas that the Earth itself is a massive onion, like with those World-Turtle mythologies, but at the very least we can conclude that nature settles on designs that work. Earth might not be “alive”, but it may just be, like with all other bulbous plants, the most simple form for a massive orb-shaped planet to take and maintain its internal cycles. Otherwise it would just freeze and “die” like Mars is theorized to have done.
I may be wrong, but it’s fun to think about. We can at least agree that they aren’t telling us the whole truth, right?
With that definition of flat earther, I'm definitely in that camp. In my eyes the whole world looks set up for that event. Do other people not see this? It seems obvious to me.
Regarding the rest of the post, you're far more knowledgeable than I about these things, but aren't you taking symbolic concepts and presenting them literally here?