“Pencil Pusher.”
Have you heard this phrase?
What does it mean?
At first glance you may be mistaken in thinking it refers to someone who pushes pencils around all day for a job. Perhaps someone who makes pencils, and therefore must regularly push them around on various conveyor belts and into their little boxes for sale?
No. A “Pencil Pusher” actually refers to someone who does clerical work; someone who “pushes pencils” around all day by writing with them. Facts, figures, and all other sorts of hastily jotted down records. It isn’t standard secretary work, it’s a specialized form of secretary whose primary role ends up being in an office cubicle spending all day preparing TPS reports.
Nebulous unfulfilling busy work.
Many industries need such a character to play their part in the production. Accountants are the most likely to come to mind, followed by lawyers staff, and then various incarnations of “data entry” positions. They are all inglorious positions whose qualifications are particularly low, pay is low, low rate of advancement, and ultimately kill the spirit in a “death by a thousand cuts” kind of way. A bad boss can make that job infinitely worse.
Now, why do I bring this up in relation to Comms?
Because it is a Comms device. Anything idiomatic automatically lends itself well to the cryptographic natures of metaphor and figurative thought.
A computer, when told what a “Pencil Pusher” is cannot help but think literally. That’s how it was programmed. Instead, it needs a special footnote on the term, as if it were a word in and of itself rather than two put together, in order to understand the deeper meaning of the phrase. The first assumption is always that it is someone who pushes pencils around. It takes a bit of life experience and common sense in order to puzzle out what it must actually refer to. A computer cannot parse the data and think “oh, that refers to clerical work.” It most certainly also won’t conclude that it is a boring and unfulfilling position to hold. A computer doesn’t have any concept of “work” and of “labor” let alone that it could be boring or unfulfilling. A computer assumes every career path is equally as important, seeing how it has never had to work the 9-5 and automatically assumes people work any job there is to work because it’s what humans do.
It takes experience to understand the nuances behind the term.
One of Us
That is the power that idiomatic expressions hold. They are the ultimate litmus test for proving someone is not only a computer but part of your tribe. If you fail the test, someone can tell you’re not “one of us.”
A person growing up in a village, living in that village, hearing all that village’s gossip and tales, will come to a particular understanding and hold a worldview that is explicitly unique to that village. They leave the village and encounter a group off in a foreign township and crack one of their frequently used “inside jokes.” No one laughs. The crowd doesn’t know what the reference is. How could they? That joke doesn’t work outside its intended audience. That idiom falls flat amidst the ears of a foreign crowd.
Which means?
Well, it means that while you may speak the same language as the foreigners, you don’t “talk the talk.” They’ll have inside jokes you don’t understand and you’ll have inside jokes they don’t understand. You’ll have folk tales you grew up with and they’ll have folk tales they grew up with. If you came from Florida or the pan-handle and say, in reference to someone you could smell before you could see, that they are a “Skunk Ape” don’t be surprised if they are a tad bit confused as to the implications. Sure, they may be able to parse out that you are calling them stinky just by the term “skunk”, but they have no idea what a “Skunk Ape” is nor the connotations of that expression.
This is a strength of a “Tribe.” Having these expressions and tales generates a comradery amongst its people ensuring no “outsiders” could infiltrate their group without eventually failing various subtle tests of character. Once they are found out, they must either agree to conform or be cast out as an imposter.
Different Worlds
Back to our “Pencil Pusher” phrase, what do you think it would mean to an aboriginal tribesman who wears a loincloth and hunts and gathers all day? They will have no clue what type of position in their tribe that “occupation” could even refer to. They are in a world so far removed that even if you use the same language, even if they know what a pencil is and have used them, they will have no concept of a life scribbling on a paper with a bit of wood all day being sufficient effort enough to survive. He may even ponder how anyone would accept such a menial and unfulfilling livelihood compared to running, hunting, gathering, climbing, and crafting tools and weapons all day. Completely different worlds.
Then, try to use “pencil pusher” in a conversation with him. Even if you’ve attempted to explain it, he can’t understand. He can only try to compare/contrast to what he knows. His frame of reference is limited by what he knows and has experienced.
Two cops are chasing a kidnap suspect with their victim in tow and they spot a tissue paper on the ground. They keep chasing and spot another. Then another. One cop turns to another and says, “I think the victim is leaving us a trail of bread crumbs!”
In context, you might be able to extrapolate that “bread crumbs” means a “trail of connected objects for us to follow” but without the Hansel and Gretel story tale, it’s harder to explain. There isn’t just a word for “leaving a trail of connected objects to follow” and even if there was, an application or example needs to be elaborated upon to convey the true meaning and value of the act. Hence the tale. Just leaving a trail of bread crumbs in the forest seems like a waste of perfectly good bread to a computer, who would be otherwise unaware as to why one would even bother leaving a trail when it can memorize exact past movement input and reverse the process.
Only those who are part of the “inside joke” can understand the nuance and even find humor in the reference to it.
This is the basis for a “Turing Test” style proof for a cipher language. Turing tests are used to assess whether a program might have genuine intelligence — a self agency to act and question as any sentient being might do. Introspection, in a way.
Cranking out numbers will eventually allow you to guess a password or decrypt a scrambled message. It’s just trial and error at that point. You can’t trial and error your way through a message that is using an old folk tale and the understanding of its moral implications as its cipher key. Unless you both have read and UNDERSTAND the story, you will not be able to parse the metaphor and draw meaning from the interpretations.
It’s more than just a riddle. You aren’t just guessing something by what it does but rather you are defining something by what it represents…
For example.
If I were to say “the witch never started the oven” what do you think that means?
If you knew the story, you could interpret it to mean the witch did not burn to death and the children were still in danger.
But who is the “witch”?
Even if you could transcribe the message, you don’t know to whom or what that message was alluding to. The true meaning is still illusive, beyond what a computer can comprehend. A computer cannot fill in that last gap and associate people or even businesses or organizations to the characters in the story tale. It may have the scrambled message and the cipher key, and even be able to decrypt the message, but still has no idea who or what is being discussed.
This is Comms Integrity. Which employs the nebulous realm of Plausible Deniability.
Integral Uses
The uninformed conclusion is that the message is a red-herring. It’s rambling. It’s meant to annoy and distract you; keep you busy so you don’t discover what is actually being said. The best encoded message is one hidden in plain sight.
Clown-World articles about dogs eating ice cream upside down. Stories about how wild horses are going through a drought and have to be rounded up with helicopters.
Dog = Personal Assistant.
Ice Cream = Indulgence(Time-Sensitive Campaign Bribe)
Even with the first two terms, how might you parse the “upside down” bit?
Well, that depends on the context. It depends on experience. It depends on what it actually means when a dog is rolled over on its back. You have to know what it means, intrinsically, not just like an AI referencing a Wikipedia article on dogs. A dog on its back is asking for belly rubs. It’s a defenseless position looking for appeasement. A “dog” accepting bribes on its back, upside down, means they are begging and aren’t afraid to look foolish doing so. It means they’re willing to even get brain freeze(conflicting bribe constraints) as the ice cream melts on the roof of their mouth. The dog is a politician’s personal assistant. They’re the ones who “fetch” things on behalf of their master, who is otherwise too busy or too dignified to stoop down and pick up things off the ground(lower class).
A dog is excused to get dirty and look foolish. To be seen begging and following orders. Their owner, a politician, cannot be seen accepting bribes. They need a middle-man to facilitate the act. They need someone to do the dirty work and get in harms way.
You need not have a whole list of descriptions and interpretations written down about dogs to understand the Comms, though it may help. Once you’re able to transpose one quirk of the humble dog onto a personal assistant, you will have unlocked the cipher key. What’s left is the manual work of transcribing the symbols into a form you can more easily understand.
A dog wags its tail.
What is a tail to a dog? It’s it’s key indicator of emotion, sure. What does it mean to someone looking at a dog? It means the dog is happy. It means the dog is excited. You say to people they make your dog’s tail wag, it means that your personal assistant likes doing business with them.
A dog buries a bone.
What is a bone to a dog? What does it mean when someone “buries a lede”? Well, it means someone is obscuring and hiding a story. Skeletons in your closet need to be buried? Hire a dog. If you hire a good one, no one will be able to “dig up your past.”
A dog steps on a bee.
Bees are paparazzi. They swarm around flowers(stars/celebrities) and buzz(“what’s all the buzz about?”). They collect “sensational” honey. Liquid gold. Nectar of the “gods.” If your dog steps on a bee, it means your dog ignored a very important meeting with a paparazzi contact. Perhaps the dog even insulted the bee in saying the paparazzi was “beneath them.” Be careful insulting a bee, lest you draw the attention of the swarm. Death by a hundred stings. Each paparazzi digging into your flesh with their ink pen; oozing pages worth of venom, and striking at you’re core.
You cannot parse these terms unless you understand both the relationship between dogs and the owners and people of influence and their personal assistants; or bees and the entertainment industry. When you understand that they are similar, that they are functional equivalencies, then you can mask one set of circumstances and events using the language of the other relationship.
Pet Owner is to Politician/Celebrity as Dog is to Personal Assistant.
A simile.
So when you’re told a bunch of horses are being rounded up with helicopters…
You start to wonder just how important that story is.
What is a horse? Well, they can run races, pull carts and carriages, have to be broken in, wear special shoes, herbivores, neigh and whinny, and are the best friend to the cowboy.
Politicians run races.
Influencers push and pull bandwagons.
Ivy League University students often go through a hazing.
Tap-dancers wear metal shoes (what does it mean to politically dance for someone?)
Money is green and leafy and all a businessman needs to be happy.
Public speakers who specialize in hyping up a crowd often hoot and holler.
Special Interests Handlers need to ride a Politician in order to push their agenda.
Put it all together?
Horses are politicians. Political Activists, to be exact. Not all horses run races. The ones that don’t make the cut often relegated to just pushing and pulling around the “bandwagons” of the campaigns. The lucky few rise up to the role of rodeo horses, and get upon stage with other cowboys and their horses to hoot, holler, and excite the masses.
Rodeo = Debate
Who are the Rodeo Clowns? Who are the ones who pull the cowboys(handlers) out of harms way when the horse goes wild and the bulls try to gorge them? All with a smile on their face. With masks and funny disguises that hide their true purpose, as the distraction when things don’t go according to the show’s regularly scheduled programing.
CIA.
Clowns In America.
What is a “helicopter parent?”
Kinda like “handler”, correct? Someone who is overbearing and always hovering over the shoulder of their child while they do their homework or practice their piano. A parent who is over-protective and won’t let the child out of their sight. A parent who whips their submissive child into obedience. No leashes or reigns to be found, but there is an overpowering pressure from above and an unshakable gaze oppressing you into compliance. A smothering of “love.”
What is a “wild horse” then? A political activist without horse shoes, no platform of their own, and no reigns to keep them from stampeding everywhere? Who foments anger among the minority communities and whips them up into voting for people who don’t have their best interests in mind?
Helicopter = Distant Handler, Coraller
Wild Horse = Clueless Political Activist / Useful Idiot / Victim of Propaganda
Even the betting around horse races are allusions to the high stakes gambling that is American Politics. Many businesses and special interests, the ones without Globalist Domination agendas, have a lot of money tied into their respective candidates. They’re more than happy to slip a horse some tranquilizer if it means they get their big payout at the derby.
Now, remember what I said about Comms Integrity.
You Need Understanding
You can’t put all this together if you don’t know about horses. You can’t put all this together if you don’t know about rodeos. You can’t put all this together without being an American in America and growing up with American values. Few other places have rodeos. There is only once CIA, though there are many copy-cats “loyal” to their own nations.
That CIA is organized like the American Rodeo. They go “from town to town” set up their tents, hype up crowds of people, dirt is flung everywhere, they put on a show, and then leave as soon as they came, with the crowd a little bit poorer and nothing other than an exciting romp to remember “fondly”.
Then again, there’s some who secretly wish every now and then that a cowboy will go up against the bull and get the horns…
Trump got the primary nomination because they thought he was a “bull.” He’s a fantastic bull-shitter after all. Usually the bull is a big intimidating creature that the cowboy, or matador, can “outwit” and prove the better of. In reality, like at the Rodeo, it’s a rigged game against the bull. In the case of Hillary Clinton, however, she found out her Perot wasn’t the fall guy they thought he was. No, Trump was that one in a million Rodeo show where the cowboy, Hillary, was torn off her high horse, gored right up her vile arkancidal ass and was summarily crippled into retirement.
But, with enough bread and circuses, and a careful vetting of horse, cowboy, and bull, they get their show and a developing nation is left embroiled in political warfare, espionage, and political hacks upsetting a once-before stable and unassuming country.
That’s the CIA in a nutshell. The dirtiest Rodeo on Earth.
And the moral of this story is that knowing this, and knowing how the cipher key is constructed, you can complete a full picture of the CIA and how they operate with nothing other than knowing a Horse = Politician.
You need plenty of examples to check to make sure you’re not just seeing things. You need proofs and sample cases that confirm and reinforce the terms, binding to their meaning.
Everything else can be transposed, transformed, and transcribed from there. Graphical calculations, performed with a Compass. It just takes some time and some experience. So long as the Comms Integrity stays intact, you can discern just about any of the processes us Humans have settled upon. You’ll be surprised to know most careers, businesses, occupations, etc. model themselves after one or more natural systems. Armies are modeled after ants, which is why we call them “army ants.”
Consistency is Essential for Integrity
For all these reasons, the terms and understandings must hold firm.
Or else.
The Comms Integrity must stay Consistent. You can’t go redefining terms all the time. You can’t lie about how the world works and still expect your cipher system that uses the world as a key will still unlock the scrambled message; that everyone will still be able to follow your lead.
What happens when you carefully write a program only for the coding language developers to update all their syntax rules every time you look up?
Chaos.
Nothing gets done.
When Hollywood or the MSM establishes the terms, they must hold true in the natural world. They can’t misuse the terms to fit their narrative, like they really can’t help themselves to do. They can’t just create fake concepts and push them like they actually happen, just to build a Comms device around it.
When they claim Trump is using “dog whistles” to foment his base into violence, it has to be true. It can’t just be speculation.
Otherwise, they undermine their own Comms Integrity. “Readers” of Comms will get confused. They will see the “enlightened” ones talk in the hidden language and assure them with certainty that things are going in the Cabal’s favor, only to have them not pan out as they were predicted. They begin to question not only the power of the Cabal, but their understanding of the world. They lose faith in their dark masters, which breeds desperation.
This introduces noise into the system, like noise interrupting the signal on an encrypted radio channel. It is ESSENTIAL for the message to be sent and received clearly. It is ESSENTIAL for the orders to be certain and accurate. When they use emotion in a cipher system, due to the fear of being found out, they inevitably make mistakes.
Mistakes in sensitive information transfers cost lives.
They keep changing the system’s syntax to try and “one-up” anyone snooping in on their efforts. They made a language for their own “tribe” to use thinking they made it so that no one could use it against them.
They never believed for a moment that they’d have to change up the system their cunning ancestor’s ancestors painstakingly devised(more like discovered) to send messages to one another free from the prying eyes of the “sheep.”
That’s why it’s said: “Symbolism will be their Downfall.”
Because they overestimated their system’s security. They abused its integrity.
They used it for everything petty and vainglorious in their day to day, flaunting the features and stressing the system of encryption. Until all the terms began to break down and the “normies” started to get suspicious. Instead of using it for absolutely essential communications, they used it for frivolous things. People began to catch on.
These articles we now refer to as “Clown World” articles.
BBC: Every Bitcoin payment 'uses a swimming pool of water'
The Cabal are crazy, but not that crazy.
These articles aren’t supposed to be taken literally. They are encoded. A message is being sent to the “in-crowd”; sent to the “tribe.”
The public gets their Clown World chuckles and honks and moves on.
However, anyone who is Comms Aware can smell the desperation a mile away. Like a crew scrambling to keep the ship afloat knowing the hull has been breached, yet not willing to tell the passengers they are all doomed.
Cabal bigwigs who run the Comms articles are trying to plug the holes, and they send out these types of “cLImaTE chAnGe iS KilLinG US!” articles. These articles don’t instill faith into the Cabal’s underlings.
Climate Change = An end to their Globalist Climate
Their little pyramid where they are the top stone and we are the weight-bearing slaves.
That’s why they originally pushed “Global Warming.”
It’s not talking about the temperature of the literal Earth. It’s talking about the “heating up” of their Globalist takeover. The “10 years ‘til we all die” articles are talking about [THEM] and [THEIR WORLD]. The Mafia Crime network that’s been going on for centuries. Their little crimes were being put in the “spotlight” and they feared the possibility the sheep were catching on to their NWO dystopian efforts.
That’s an example of their carefully crafted cipher terms not working. In their desperation they got too literal, and applied a system on Earth that just didn’t pan out in the decryption phase of the message syntax.
So, they changed the syntax to make it work.
“Global Warming” became “Climate Change.”
They push the new term, and the old messaging system regains functionality relative to the deep failings of the prior terms. It still doesn’t work, though, because the Earth’s climate isn’t in fact “warming up” or “changing.” At least, not how their “experts” theorize it is. Greenhouse gases(echo-chamber rumors / online forum theories) aren’t a bad thing for the Earth. It’s a bad thing for their NWO schemes, sure, but in that they made the mistake of comparing their Globalist Dystopia with the Earth itself. They are so full of themselves that they really, truly believe the “World will end” if they weren’t in charge of it.
They are so deluded into thinking the host can only survive with them, the parasite. They honestly believe ticks are a necessary part of the ecosystem. They cannot fathom that the world may very well be better off without certain pests like them in charge of the fate of everyone else.
The tick is not meant to rule. It never was.
So, they will continue to go on misusing the Comms system, because they have a failed understanding not only of the literal world and nature, but because they also do not understand that people aren’t sheep.
People are people, though sometimes they may act like sheep.
Men are men. Women are women.
They are not “goy” or “infidel.”
Neither swine or chattel.
Humans are NOT animals. (The demons hate that)
Humans are people. With their own agency. An agency that despises being told how to live their lives. An agency that yearns for freedom, not for the mines.
So…
They’re screwed.
Symbolism will be their downfall. Because they don’t understand the symbols anymore, if they ever did. Nepotism had a lot to do with that.
They are trying to fit circle pegs into square holes. All because they believed their own lies. They are so enamoured with themselves they can’t see that everyone in the world despises them. They surround themselves with yes-men and grovelers that no one is there to tell them the truth; that the public sees them not as “stars” in the night sky, but burning meteors who are plummeting to Earth like lightning — like Lucifer.
Eternal Damnation soon follows. Judgement Day.
Everyone’s so afraid to tell the Big Guy the truth — that the company is failing because the boss is an old, feeble, evil, and cruel imbecile.
If they did say the truth to his face, they’d be Epstein’d in a heartbeat.
So, what’s a Cabal cultist to do?
Keep telling the boss that “everything is going fine and they’ll get their NWO dystopia, sure thing, don’t worry about it!”
Meanwhile, the Comms mail-room is burning down.
You can’t help but laugh at it sometimes. Sucks that [their world] is built on the back of our world though, so it’s only funny to a point. We still have to deal with corpse disposal, and let me tell ya it’s a big, stinking, bloated corpse we gotta haul out of their child-blood encrusted mansions.
It still has to be done, though…
They tried to use “Global Warming” and “Climate Change” to describe what’s happening to [their world]. In reality, they chose the wrong term.
The correct term is “The Great Awakening.” It’s more accurate, because it’s true.
We are waking up.







FANTASTIC WRITEUP. Thank you. The guy over at decodingsymbols.wordpress.com got me interested in this but your writing has really given me the essential holistic understanding, especially this article.
Question for you, if you have a minute. You've helped me understand how the symbolism is present, but I've wondered as to how some of these clown articles are applied. How exactly do seemingly very general comms prompt action from a certain individual or group? How is it useful to the person putting the comms out? Or are a lot of them just general communications -- in other words, the owner of the publication communicating to the cabal at large?
I guess I can see how "Biden's dog bit someone again" could be directly useful, as it lets people know that Biden's personal assistant did something (or something of that nature) and if you knew what was up then you'd know why that's important... but are clowns really going to know about the dealings of Biden's personal assistant? How do you get value from this comm without extreme insider info?
I guess maybe it's just a matter of me not really understanding the full picture? But wouldn't the clowns not see the full picture either? Or maybe if you understood every comm, you'd immediately see when a certain clown article applies to you? And I guess certain clowns know to focus on certain publications to look for comms? Just seems like some of the clown articles are really short.
Hope that made sense, no need to answer every question of course, just trying to put the finishing touches on my understanding of the concept. Have read all of your posts and may have missed it somewhere.
Also, here's a post I wrote on another Substack, may be of interest to you, seems to link to what you write about in a way, I believe many of the clowns are actually literal slaves without their own agency in a lot of cases due to trauma-based programming: https://shawnpaulmelville.substack.com/p/warning-len-bers-microscopy-slides/comment/44491265
For what it's worth, Matt Hayden (Australia) regularly digs into suspected cabal comms in the Daily Telegraph. Matt acknowledges he might be bat-s**t crazy, but then again he could be onto something.
Posts can be found on Rumble: https://rumbleDOTcom/c/MattHayden